Back to your local site:
 



Knight Ridder election blogs
  • Hot off the Trail
  • Life of the Parties
  • Ozblog
  • Ohioblog
  • Campaign Extra!
  • Infomaniac: WeBlog
  • Free-Fire Zone
  • Debate This!


  • Blogroll
  • Jay Rosen's PressThink
  • Yahoo's Blog Roundup
  • Feedster's Politics Page
  • Technorati Election Watch
  • Romenesko
  • CyberJournalist
  • Lost Remote
  • TV Newser
  • Blogging of the President
  • Tapped
  • Nat. Review's The Corner
  • The Command Post
  • Daily Kos
  • Campaign Desk
  • Scripting News
  • Roger L. Simon
  • Matt Welch
  • KausFiles
  • ABC's The Note
  • Tacitus
  • Power Line
  • Blogs for Bush
  • OxBlog
  • Talk Left
  • Political Wire
  • Glenn Reynolds: Instapundit
  • Jeff Jarvis: Buzzmachine
  • Talking Points Memo
  • Betsy's Page




  • Free-Fire Zone

    Campaign commentary from the left and the right
    Have a question? E-mail our columnists!

    Wednesday, October 13, 2004

    So, now what? 

    Well, it's a wash on the three debates. Kerry one the first one, the second one was a tie, Bush won this one. The president was much more relaxed, found a humorous note or two; Kerry was the one on the defensive. He feels he has to keep reassuring the country that he would defend it; that is not reassuring. The strange thing is that the Bush people reportedly wanted the first debate to be on foreign policy because that is supposedly his strength. But his best performances were on the domestic part of the second debate (that's why it was a tie) and this debate. Best line of the night: "That makes Kennedy the conservative senator from Massachusetts."

    Does Kerry have the advantage because he won the first one big and put the president on the run when more people were watching? Or does the president, because he won the last one and will have momentum? Dunno. This is all about style anyway, how two men looked and seemed for three and a half hours out of a year-long campaign.

    What we're left with is what we started with, the substance of what the candidates have stood for. Internationally, two different views on how to fight terrorism and what Iraq means. Domestically - not much difference between what Bush did in his first term and what Kerry would do in a first term, but a gulf between those two and what Bush would do in a second term. There couldn't be two more different candidates, and it's hard to imagine there are people who still don't know enough to make a pick. To think, this thing will actually come down to the mood swings of the undecided.

    ... and I've always heard, of jury trials, that it is frightening to trust your fate to the 12 most uninformed people the court can find. That's about how I now feel about this election.

    posted by Leo Morris at # 11:01 PM




    TowarnickyMorris

    On the left: Carol Towarnicky, chief editorial writer for the Philadelphia Daily News, from a liberal point of view.

    On the right: Leo Morris, editorial page editor of the Fort Wayne (Ind.) News-Sentinel, from a conservative point of view.


     Latest posts
       •  Closing thoughts
       •  Left, right and in between
       •  On litmus tests
       •  Maybe he's perfect
       •  Bang, bang
       •  Has anyone ever flunked a litmus test?
       •  Kerry's right on the assault weapons ban
       •  Reader question: Why can't we stop immigrants?
       •  Oh, Lord
       •  Roe vs. Wade



     Archives
       •  09/26/2004 - 10/03/2004
       •  10/03/2004 - 10/10/2004
       •  10/10/2004 - 10/17/2004
       •  10/17/2004 - 10/24/2004
       •  10/24/2004 - 10/31/2004
       •  10/31/2004 - 11/07/2004
       •  11/07/2004 - 11/14/2004
       •  11/14/2004 - 11/21/2004

    XML-RSS feed










    About Realcities Network | About Knight Ridder | Terms of Use & Privacy Statement

    Copyright 2004 Knight Ridder. All rights reserved. Any copying, redistribution or retransmission of any
    of the contents of this service without the express written consent of Knight Ridder is expressly prohibited.